Alex Knox is an evil puppetmaster, who currently is an anarchist Texan cowboy (how that works out I dunno) by day and a professed female stripper by night...



Good mp3 blogs

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Humans use Opera





Friday, January 31, 2003
 
So there I was, on my way to Scrabble Club, which I would never not go to after so lobbying for it's return, when I noticed something rustling in the bushes.

"Hey you, c'mere", said the bushes

I so went there, and a little man dressed all in green popped out

"Aye sir, you must come to my land! We're being plagued by a goblin horde and only you can stop them! You'll be King for life, it'll be sweet!"

But I remained resolute. No, I told him, I could not be King, for I had to go to Scrabble Club. And on I went, and was almost there, when I was transported to a strange dimension of swirling colours. You could almost pick a geometric pattern out at the edges of your eyes, but if you looked it went away. Three hooded figures came towards me (I say 'figures', though this is inaccurate, as they were more like humanoid gray. And I say came, but this is also inaccurate, as everything was just swirling colours, there was no distance, but nevertheless, they came towards me) and said

"Sir, for a few minutes of your time we will give you all the knowledge there is to no. You will be the wisest in your world, a sage beyond all your world has produced. A new Golden Era will come about due to your wisdom! Only a few minutes of your time!"

"No, for I must go to Scrabble Club"

"Scrabble Club? But you could--"

"Scrabble Club."

Then they sorta shrugged and I was sent back. I shook some colours off and was almost at the door when suddenly I was surrounded by a brilliant light. When it subsided, there were a bunch of aliens looking at me. Not even consistent aliens, but all different sorts: there was one that looked like it was covered in huge orange dreads (its whole body, I mean), a couple of angry reptilian sorts, and then a bunch of cliche grey ones working the controls. The orange one said,

"Meedle-beep!"

Which prompted one of the reptilian ones to shout "Tell us all you know!". I didn't know reptilian aliens could spit when they talk, but they do. Anyway, I told him

"I have to go to Scrabble Club"

But they wouldn't let me go! He gargled something at Mr. Meedle-beep, who said,

"Meedle-beep!"

And they wouldn't let me go. And they told me to tell them all I knew again. And I told them I had to be at Scrabble Club, and they told me to Tell Us All You Know!, and I told 'em how I knew that Scrabble Club was going on and we went 'round like that for a while, when finally Mr. Meedle-beep poofed out a bit of air and said,

"Meedle-beep!"

Which apparently means, "Tell us all you know about this 'Scrabble'! spit spit spit". So I described the basic outline, the point system and all as best I could remember and they sent out one of the grays and he came back with a Scrabble board. Mr. Meedle-beep told me,

"Meedle-beep!"

And as I was starting to get the hang of it I stopped the Reptilian and told them "Alright, I'll teach you". And I taught them how to play (apparently Meedle-beep! is just for speaking, and he can write English perfectly well, though curiously enough the Reptiles could only seem to get the hang of three and seven letter words), and Mr. Meedle-beep said,

"Meedle-beep!"

Which, roughly translated, means "Very well, here is my proposal: you will play with us a game of Scrabble. If you win, you can go, if you lose, we will anally probe you." And to satisfy something that's always bothered me I asked him why exactly they did anal probes, and he did that poofing thing again and said that it was none of my business (Well, actually he said "Meedle-beep!", but you have to read between the lines with these things).

So anyway, we played a game of Scrabble, and I admit I was a bit off that night. Maybe it was the Nocturnalism or maybe his Meedle-beeping was throwing me off, but I could just not play. So we were getting towards the end of the game and I was even behind the Reptian, when I shouted

"Hey, look over there!"

And they looked, and then I killed them all. I could've switched the scores or something, I suppose, but no, I think this is better. Luckily the controls were in English, and there was an instruction manual, also in English, so I got home just fine. So I parked the spaceship outside, all cloaked and everything, and ran to Scrabble Club. But everyone was gone.

I had missed Scrabble Club. So now I'm out the Kingship of a fantasy world, out all the knowledge of the world, I missed Scrabble Club, and on top of that I can't find the damned spaceship again. Anyway, that's the short story of why I wasn't at Scrabble Club. I guess it's good I didn't get anal-probed, but nevertheless, the evening was entirely unsatisfactory.

1:20 AM


Thursday, January 30, 2003
 
Attention: to many of you this is irrelevent. However, a select few of you have come under the power of spam viruses. These (legal) viruses infect people and make them send out links to a site which in turn infects the new visitors. They manage to get people to do this by having "games" which are little more than seeing who can spam the most. I won't provide any links, as I don't want to encourage this, but they're out there.

Now I'm quite sick of it, and am hereby providing notice that any time I see any of these under any medium, I'm reporting the person as a spammer. It's for your own good.

3:58 AM


 
I actually meant to talk about this earlier, but then important things like the Amish and anarchic torture came up, which reminds me: the nuns got thrown in federal prison. As well as one priest. They got thrown in prison for crossing the line cops established around the School of the Americas (now has some different name that I can't be bothered memorizing). The School of the Americas, if you're unaware, is where they train dictators for Latin America. Graduates include Maneul Noreiga, and some others, but I'm just going off the top of my head and he's all I can remember. Anyway, go to soaw.org for more info.

Returning to the people about whom I originally meant to speak: the Luddites. The Luddites have gotten a bad rap in history. Once upon a time, a young Ned Lud, either through craziness or clumsiness, destroyed two frameworking machines. So after that, when machines were destroyed, people said 'Oh, must've been Ned Lud'. So, now to the early ninteenth century. The Industrial Revolution was beginning in England, and mechanical weaving-frames had just come out. These essentially obsoleted (yes, I verbed it) the weavers, who were understandably upset about this. So they grouped together and released a list of demands: they wanted better wages, less unemployment, and a halt to the use of mechanical weaving-frames. One of their chief complaints was that the weaving-frames did shoddy work, so it was an affront to their craftsmanship. When they didn't get demands, they took it upon themselves to get rid of the frames, and set about smashing them.

This actually worked, for a while; the Lords and Ladies employing them started using weavers more and with better pay. The Luddites were extremely popular with the masses, but alas, the nobles saw this as setting a bad precedent (if the lower class realises it can get what it wants, well...), so they sent out a huge army. It took 12,000 men to finally subdue them, but when they did the Luddites were very dead. And forever stained in history. Because ever since, if you want to say someone is resisting progress, you call them a Luddite. Which is fair, I suppose; they did resist progress, but using it as an insult? These guys were pretty damn mighty, they saw that their art was threatened and they acted in defense of it. That they were ultimately unsuccessful doesn't mean we should attack them.

This is why Luddites are on the list of people to recieve Alex's Seal of Approval. It's a growing list, and I'm really not trying for a theme here, finding one group every time, as there aren't enough groups I approve of to last all that long, but that's how it's turned out so far. Anyway, as the list stands, it is:

Nuns, and Monx to a lesser degree
The Amish
Luddites

And if we ever make an Alex's Seal of Disapproval, it'll have:

Philosophy
Modern Art
Ads

Heehee...Amish and Luddites on one side, Philosophy and Modern Art on the other, I'm becoming quite the anti-intellectual. Ah, well. Anyway, I feel vaguely like I had something else to say, but I can always post again later, so I'm bowing out.

2:49 AM


Wednesday, January 29, 2003
 
There are some things that they don't tell you when you're growing up. They don't tell you that elementary school is pretty worthless, that you would be a better 'artist' than a lot of the yabbos that do it, or that there are things called 'pet therapists'. Really, the last one is enough to cry. Anyway, what they really don't tell you about is Rumspringa. I just found out about it myself. For almost all their life, the Amish are a extremely orthodox people, following harsh rules: little technology is allowed, women have one job (bear children), etc.

But!

But at 16 the young Amish teenager enters something called 'Rumspringa'. Here they are allowed to experiment with everything, and they do. They drink, do drugs, and sleep together quite casually. They have huge parties that combine the three evils of sex, drugs, and rock n' roll. In '99, two Amish teens were arrested for selling millions of dollars worth of cocaine (just Rumspringa, officer!) If at the end of Rumspringa (no predefined time, just when the kid feels like it) they still want to be Amish then they are welcomed back in, but they have to sell all the stuff and go back to abiding strictly by Amish rules.

Wow.

My source for this, by the way, is all from reading about some documentary called The Devil's Playground. I haven't actually seen this. Anyway, I'm going to go sulk that I wasn't born Amish.

Update: this was confirmed by this article, which contains the line 'On this night, deputies report "Buggy all over the road ... headed toward (State Route)168 1 mph."'

1:39 AM


 
ITS tells me they're going to cut me off the internet at the end of, err, yesterday, so I better hurry.

I feel vaguely embarassed to be an anarchist... http://www.guardian.co.uk/spain/article/0,2763,883074,00.html. On behalf of all anarchists to the fascists/commies: heh. whoops. our bad!

Really, I think this says something about Modern Art. It hadn't even been around that long by the Spanish Civil War, and people were already using it for torture. This pretty much describes how I feel when I'm forced to look at Modern Art. I know I'm unculture, but what I want out of art is for it to look pretty. The number of people who have seen a picture and seriously been influenced to somehow dramatically change their lives is pretty low, so if we accept it's a secondary mode of communication to writing/speaking (forms which have transformed countless people), and it has to have some purpose, I say that purpose should be to look pretty.

Modern Art, on the other hand, says that that purpose should be to be as cryptic as possible. This makes the artist seem really intelligent, because look, I called this perfectly normal thing art, aren't I so clever! Tee-hee! It also makes the curator of the museum look intelligent-I recognise this as art because he said so!-and visitors to the museum smart-we appreciate art!-and people that think it's pointless, we look dumb. We're not part of the club of people that 'get it', and we're not even sure what 'it' is to get. So basically it's a great ego-boost for the artist and all his friends, and he gets paid! I would become a modern artist, but I don't have the skills necessary to maintain that level of pretension.

I'm not saying there's not modern art I like. For instance, in the Chicago Art Institute there's a corner of one room that's kept continually restocked with candies that you can eat, as an art exhibit. I'm sure it's saying that art should be more tactile and we don't appreciate its sweetness or something, but what it really says to me is 'eat me, I'm strawberry flavoured!'. And anything that says that is ok in my book. And then there are modern arts that actually are pretty, and those are of course ok. Jackson Pollock-and for anyone who's going to start talking about how Pollock wasn't really modern art or something, no, I don't care- I have to give grudging respect. Apparently his works had a strict fractal form. Which is pretty cool. They even think that they can date the work of a Pollock and tell the difference between a real and a fake using this.

Of course, some cynics might point out that anytime you have to use advanced mathematical techniques to be able to tell if something is a fake God might be sending you a clue that it isn't really art.

Fractals, for that matter, are pretty. We were being shown some in Astronomy class today (to illustrate science...no matter how far you got in, there was still more to get), and he turned off the lights and everything, and it was very pretty. Astronomy is a bit of a disappointment, I might add. What I had thought would be that we would spend all our time in those chairs that lean down, looking at the ceiling, which would have a starmap, and he would point out various constellations to us. Instead, here we are, learning about the Scientific Method. I can't tell you how many times I've learnt about the Scientific Method. It seems every teacher assumes all the ones prior to himself somehow forgot to teach about the Scientific Method, and that finally he will bring to light just what we're doing. Gee, thanks.

Well, I'm going to post this before I lost my internet connection.


PS Jenny, if you read this, or Mom to pass it on to Jenny, I don't hate you and had in fact unblocked you earlier today. I only blocked you to keep me from doing dumb stuff like recommending more music to you, but I don't want to piss anyone off, so you're unblocked.

1:12 AM


Tuesday, January 28, 2003
 
I've noticed that you can get away with a lot of things in life if you just respond by saying "I'm an art student"

-Anonymous Crimethincer

Samia is absolutely right when she says that she's not allowed to tell anyone their life is mediocre. She's just a foolish Samia, what does she know? Now me, on the other hand, I can judge other people. Yes, the ability to judge came to me as naturally as talking does to other people (I mean, I can talk, it's just typically only to judge someone that I do so). I employ it about as much as other people talk, too. Some people say 'judge not lest you be judged', which is fine by me, for anyone judging me will surely come to the conclusion that I am like Superman, except for the super strength and flying and laser eyes and so on. But he was a good guy, Superman, a super guy, just like me.

And so it is with no apologies that I will judge other people, that I will strike down certain lifestyles as worthless and hold others high in regard. And another thing. Already I can see that committing my thoughts to paper is going to result in lots of 'you're a bloody hypocrite', so let me say this right now: yes, yes I am. I don't deny it. I'm slowly trying to get better, but at this point, I'm a total hypocrite in a lot of regards. I'm addicted to the internet/computers in general, I eat at Taco Bell, I occasionally even buy corporate goods. But the important part is that I a) recognise all this as bad, and b) am slowly doing something about it. I would say I'm less of a hypocrite than last year, so at least that's something.

However, don't let my hypocrisy keep you from heeding my advice. It's good advice, every bit of it, and you should, if you see something about yourself reflected here, go 'Wow! He's so right! I will change my life of sin just like that! Perhaps I will join a nunnery/monastery!' I have a great regard for nuns and monks. More the former than the latter, 'cause you don't see the latter around as much. I mean, don't get me wrong, monks (or monx, as they like to be known on the internet), have done great good in the past, genetics and printing and all, but what have they done for me recently? Really the best part of monx are their cool robes. I love those robes. Big brown robes with hoods, that's just classy.

Anyway, nuns are the cool ones nowadays. Not a month goes by I don't hear about Nuns getting arrested for some social justice thing: for protesting at School of Americas, Tibet,School of Americas again, with more nuns!, and I can't find the one I'm really looking for, where they actively stopped missiles from being shipped for a few hours by forming a human wall, but they did that too. Nuns: wow.

And then, of course, there's just the coolness of giving up modern life to live simply and in total devotion to your God. Again, very cool.

So nuns, you get Alex's Seal of Approval, which I would upload a picture of if I could just find a site to upload pictures to.

If you know a good page for hosting pictures, mail me.

Update: a host has been found-thanks Urg!-, but now we're going to have someone make a snazzy real nice Alex's Seal of Approval. It'll be worthy of nuns.


3:05 AM


Monday, January 27, 2003
 
I consider myself a fairly idealistic person. I believe-believed-that within every person is the potential to thrive with no boundaries but their own.

So it is with heavy heart that I must announce I've lost all faith in humanity. I was in my philosophy class, ready to start talking about the Republic, when he asks if anyone has any questions. One person asks why exactly they made this book. This provoked the professor to rant for easily half an hour-and not about the book! No, he sort of diverted to a discussion of values vs. facts.

"You see, Socrates said-and whether you agree or not, let's respect it as an intelligible position, that is, let's say that we can at least understand where he's coming from-Socrates said that you could say these sorts of things-the sorts of things we've been discussing, justice and rights and so on-all have one correct answer. So, though we may, we living in a democracy with a constitution and all-and I think most of us would support that, you know, human rights-,we look at the Taliban and say that that's not right, he would say it is. I mean, not that the Taliban's right, but that there's just one answer to this question."

This led to him clarifying exactly what a 'value judgement' and a 'factual judgement' was. Now, I don't know about you, but much of my youth was occupied listing statements as either 'facts' or 'opinions' on worksheets in class. This chair is blue (fact), she is pretty (opinion), George Bush is intelligent (neither). To see that we would just be getting more of this in college was, well, depressing, that is, it made me depressed, I don't mean that the room was actually depressed per se, though I suppose it's feasible, so great was my depression. You see.

What really stuns me was not that he was so blatantly bullshitting right in front of us, it's that people were encouraging him. Hands were raised. People were taking notes. I encourage participation in class if you're actually learning something, I'm often the only one shouting out answers when some poor teachers trying to get the class to actually respond, but this? Were it up to me, we would have all as one folded our hands together, sat bolt upright, and stared at him. Frowned at him. Like this guy:


(Thanks Image Google!)


Sigh. I do so hate bullshit when I'm not doing it.

11:33 AM


 
I am a Marble Master. You know how I said I beat a Red Wizard with Staff of HTML +4? Well, I beat him with Magic Marbles, which are like Magic Missiles but much more powerful. I beat every one of those 72 levels, in one day. I don't want to hear 'Oh, that's so sad' because it's not sad. It's SUPER. You're just jealous.

And you know what happened today? The Superbowl! I hadn't even heard about it, isn't that great? When I went home for Christmas break I was struck by just how much worthless shit I never learn while I'm at college, like what the newest reality show is or what movies are in the theatres. Or when the Superbowl is. It's not that I dislike football per se, it's just that it's not worth the ads. People tend to think of ads as free, which is, I think, a mistake. Think: when was the last time you saw an ad and thought "I absolutely must get that"? Chances are, that doesn't really happen, except for things like 'Hits of the 70s: Disco's Revenge". And yet they continue to advertise...and why is that? They're getting something for it. Any good advertiser knows that they're not aiming for the conscious level, they're trying to affect you beneath it. In a truck commercial with Texan flags in the background they're not trying to sell you a truck, they're trying to sell to you that to have a big truck is to be a Texan. In the diamond commercial they're not trying to sell you a diamond, they're trying to sell you that diamond=love=forever.

Cynical Americans, however, tend to think 'Oh, my mind is impervious, because I know what they're trying to do I can counter it'. For one, I don't really think this is true. Advertisers nowadays know there's an entire audience out for irony and they'll throw knowing winks to them as well (all the while sliming their way in). Even if it was true, that's a pretty selfish attitude-here you know that millions are being brainwashed, and you do nothing to stop it? But what then, you ask? Surely not watching TV isn't going to help anyone, so it doesn't matter if I watch it or not!

The fact of the matter is that there's a reason people watch TV and ads and it goes beyond the programming (which anyone who has ever watched a reality show must know). It's really easy to watch TV. It's worthless, it's a waste of your time, but it's really easy. So what the proper 'culture jammer', as Adbusters likes to call them, must do is to try to give people a better option. No one's going to watch TV if they have something, anything better to do. So you have to give them something better to do. Go out and do something, preferably something active, but even just watching a movie together. Movies at least don't have ads, and they're of higher quality than most tv. This is the most simple way you can fight advertising, which is trying to define who we-as individuals and as society-are.

For some hardcore culture jamming, try here. Or good ol' Maddox's tips on fighting mail spam.

Ok, I'm sorry, I didn't really mean to get on that rant, I'd actually intended to do something about football, I just got caught up talking about ads. It pretty much would have been the same thing for football, though: even watching the Superbowl can't compare to going out and playing a game with your friends. And people, when you play that game, don't care about rules or in-bounds or out-of-bounds or if you're really good, about points. Just play.

PS For anyone who's about to say "I like how you spent 10 hours playing a video game then talk about how you have to seize life", yes, thank you, I'd never realised such hypocrisies, oh my life is a living irony, etc.

3:10 AM


Sunday, January 26, 2003
 
Had a bit of technical difficulties which resulted in me having to delete the last post (and even that was only possible after dueling the Red Wizard with Staff of HTML +4)...but luckily, I was able to save the content, which I shall reprint now:

Wow that game is good.

I'm taking a bit of a break right now, because I'm really really hungry. I forgot to get food before Wendy's closed (was blasting them marbles), so I haven't eaten anything since 'round 1 pm. So I'm going to eat a healthy breakfast (chocolate donuts, cheetos, and a sprite...you know, I actually wish they had a healthy vending machine...I never thought I would say that) and not blast marbles for a while. To take my mind off food and Marble Blast, I'll talk more about Against Me:

They do shout. They don't really sing (in most songs) so much as shout in tune. My roommate (who I believe, if he had one wish in the world, would be to go back in time and stop me before I found them) said "They might be good if only they could learn to sing", but he doesn't realise that that would ruin them. Then they'd be just another calm band, there wouldn't be the...electrical, a silly adjective here, but it captures the feel...the electrical vibe in every song. They believe what they're singing, they really believe it, and if only everyone else would believe it too....

It's rather like in SLC Punk, when it flashes back to him first hearing Punk: "What is it?" "It's something new". Speaking of that movie (notice how subtly I bridge...I'd actually sort of planned that, but were I not adding this here you would never have known, and there is the power of the author), I didn't like it much. Oh sure, it had its good points, but overall I really didn't like it. That's not what punks are like. They were just as much a gang as any of their enemies....on that level, perhaps, that unless you get out of fighting and meanness you'll never be different from your enemies, it was ok, but I don't really think that was meant, except as a snide comment at punks. And their version of anarchy. "Anarchy is chaos". Hmph...you would think that someone who could get into Harvard Law School (apparently without really trying) would have at least learned a little bit about their own philosophies. "Anarchy is organisation" is a dead-on quote from...Errico Maletesta (thanks Anarchy Archives). It's intrinsic to anarchy that there be lots of organisation (at every point), or it would just be, well, anarchy. And in the sake of not spoiling, I shan't go into what he finally does, but let's just say that I sure didn't like that.

You know, there's definately something empowering about thinking anyone cares about every little detail of your day and your opinions on just about everything. And boy do I have opinions on everything. Let's talk about...drinking! Yay! This particular visit on the subject sponsered by looking at the other computer where I also have the web up, and it's on Scythe's (from me chatroom) Livejournal. I mean, there are many other peole that could provoke this visit, but he was the inciter this time. For Sunday....September 22nd! Wow, he doesn't update much...anyway, for Sept. 22nd, he complains that this weekend sucked, "I didn't even get drunk". And there's my only problem with alcohol. When it becomes a gauge of how your life has gone, there's a problem. Not that I blame him, of course; it's nigh impossible to have a normal rational attitude towards alcohol in this society. It's impossible to persuade high schoolers to drink responsibly when it's a taboo experience, when it's so hard to get alcohol that any time you can you have to amek the most of it. And of course this follows into college, where it is possible to drink responsibly, but by this time people have gotten so into the "drinking is for getting drunk" motto of high school that they either abstain altogether or get drunk at every chance.

Sigh.

Luckily, turning 21 tends to turn these people around, as for the abstainers (abstainees?) it's no longer illegal, which is generally their rationalisation of it, so they run out of good excuses, and the drunkards reach the point where they can't go on like that. And maybe they even realise how empty getting drunk every weekend is! Really, the whole point of life is to get good memories, how can you do that if you're drunk? You won't be able to remember anything...

12:50 PM


 
It's Argyrios's birthday! Happy birthday! Argy being my roommate, of course.

For his birthday, I got him Marble Blast. You get to navigate a lil' multicoloured ball through various challenges, and I simply can not say how fun it is. If anyone can beat my high score of 37.44 seconds on Intermediate level 24 (available on the demo), well, I think you're cheating. It seems once you buy the game you can dl it more than once, so I got to install it on my computer as well as his...so, as Argy put it, our weekend is pretty much booked solid. Argy prefers to excel at the intermediate, whereas I prefer the challenge of advanced.

I should wax philosophic at this point, but I really want to Blast those Marbles, so perhaps I'll update again later.

3:33 AM


Saturday, January 25, 2003
 
Ok, I seem to have it all working, I've picked out a nice and not-too-fancy layout, everything is good.

Having done this, I can start talking about what has just occured to me (this idea sponsered by a quick trip to Andrew Sullivan's blog to see what a good blog should have). It's about conservatives. It seems to me that conservatives are always conservative except in matters where it effects them negatively...ol' Andrew Sullivan, for instance, is one of the strongest conservative sponsers of gay rights-and, why, he's gay! And of course we have the rich executives who feel government should never interfere with business (and then line up for government welfare). For that matter, plenty of rich conservatives are against welfare unless it's of the corporate sort. And of course it may seem like William F. Buckley is a staunch objective supporter of marijuana liberalisation, but you just know he tokes up. All the time.

And as long as we're on the subject of conservatives, let's talk about War with Iraq. Now, I don't really have the extremely strong feelings about this that seems to have swept up much of the left-I'm against it, sure, but I think there are plenty of things to be more against. But a lot of conservatives, and hell, some liberals (Ah, Hitchens, moved from liberal pawn to neo-con pawn), have said this war is not about oil. Now come on. Give us some credit. The reason we're getting rid of Saddam is not that he's anti-US (if we were just going anti-US we might get the Sauds, who have done far more for funding terrorism than Saddam), it's not that he's a murderer (again, hardly the top of the list), it's that he's anti-oil-companies. The Bush administration can't survive without some clearly defined enemy-it was the Taliban, now Saddam (Al-Qaeda never, because they're too hard to fight to be a really good enemy...we need something with a clear home)-and when they made the list of who could be next, Iraq had to be an easy choice. I mean, we know we can beat them, their ruler is ugly, it's filled with people who are a different colour and religion, and, most of all, we stand to make great profit!

I had intended just to talk about oil, but now I'm on a rant, so I'm going to keep going. What exactly is the plan after we conquer the place? The problems won't be the same as Afghanistan (when, by the time, was the last time you heard about them? It's essentially gone back to warlord dominated, which is pretty much what was predicted) Install a US friendly dictator? Not going to be too popular with a public who's watching very closely, not to mention the rest of the world. Try to put in a republic? The people will elect someone anti-US. Try to put in a republic and rig the elections so the US candidate wins (Afghanistan again)? The people will feel, quite rightly, that they're not being listened to, and will grow extremist, I fear.

No, the best thing, if the US really wants to help out, would be to help arm a revolution. We actually said we would help out any revolution that occured after the first war, but then when the people didn't rise up, we not only didn't help them, but we let Saddam violate the no-fly zone so he could have gunships to fight them. So assuming the people still trust us for some reason, we should arm a revolution as best we can, and let them establish their own organisation. Just not stick our noses in at all.

Ok, I've gone on far too long...I'll try to figure out a way to go through and put labels next to stories so you'll be forewarned when political ones pop up, which, I fear, will be rather frequently.

7:21 AM


 
Ok! I've got this all running, now...I once started a blog before, but I was in a wretched mood for some reason, so I it's prolly best that I could never get it to post properly. Assuming you're reading this, though, I've got this one working now, so that's all good.

The problem with blogs, as I see it, is that anyone can see them. Of course, I could go into a rant here about how blogs aren't the same as diaries and the words corrupted and blah blah blah (as indeed I did with wretched-mood-blog), but since the words are virtually the same nowadays, there's no real point. Anyway, the problem is that anyone can see them. So if you're relating a deep personal crisis about how Leward has a crush on Delia, but Delia likes Richard, or what not, and Richard comes on, well, there's going to be much shouting. Much indeed. Or if Delia comes on, I suppose, but it works best with Richard, 'cause he's a jerk. And yeah, you can mark that lil' box that says 'private', but then what's the point? Just use Notepad. So don't really expect to see any relation of deep personal crises here, not that I tend to have them, but nevertheless...

Of course, there has to be a switch side or they wouldn't be so extremely popular. And that side, obviously, is that people all over the world can find out exactly what you think about a certain subject. Hell, bloggers got Lott demoted, they do actually have some power. And with the ease of getting a blog (go to library, click 'new blog', write for a few minutes-you're published!), this is easy power. And it's a level playing field-how much power you have is determined by how good a writer you are, how insightful/funny you are, etc.

The thing that perked my particular interest this time was great boredom and listening to Reinventing Axl Rose, by Against Me (I would give a homepage, but I can't find one...another reason to like this band) . I dunno if ya'll have heard this song, or this band, or this cd, but all three are fantastic. I say this as someone who generally doesn't like that sort of punk-I tend more towards Bad Religion, personally. And 'that sort of punk', in this case, means...well, like the Clash, but I don't like these Clash and I love these people...they shout a lot, which is why it's not for everyone, but it's not just random shouting, they're extremely emotive shouts. And not just whiny emotions, but quality emotions-real love (The tale of two Irish immigrants who love eachother dearly, who promise to love eachother forever, and how when the one dies the other spends the rest of her days holding a picture of them together and wishing she'd gone with him), real fervor (the band who doesn't care about money or how many people come, that would travel one million miles and ask for nothing more than some food and a place to stay), and real idealism (what if America crumbled one night, if pettiness and laws were replaced with love and equality?) I love these songs dearly and actually plan to buy the cd (I haven't bought a cd in years and years).

The reason, by the way, that I'm writing this at 6:23 in the morning is that I'm currently nocturnal-sleep from 3 PM or so to whenever I wake up. This works pretty well, but is absolutely wretched on weekends-no one wakes up early, no stores are open early, no food open early. Yes, wretched indeed.

Ok, I have more things to say, but I'm going to save them for future posts.

6:26 AM